Inherit the Wind Preview
'Inherit
the Wind' blows into town
Scopes 'monkey'
trial play to be presented by Civic Theatre
Sunday, November 7, 2004
BY JENN MCKEE
News Arts Writer
Earlier this year, the state superintendent of schools in Georgia
instructed science teachers to replace the word "evolution"
with the phrase "biological changes over time" in the course
of their instruction; and in the same state, disclaimers in many science
textbooks now inform students that evolution "is a theory, not a
fact."
Not surprisingly, both moves have ignited a firestorm of controversy,
demonstrating once again how strained, messy, and complicated the
relationship is between the republic's democratic ideals and the
majority's religious beliefs. And no play explores these fissures in our
ideological landscape quite like "Inherit the Wind," being
staged by the Ann Arbor Civic Theatre starting Thursday.
"There's a small number of classic American plays - and this is one
of them - that really defines who we are as a people," said
director Jon Elliott. "I first read the play 20 years ago, and I've
been amazed at how it continues to apply."
The classic drama is based on one of the most famous trials of
the 20th century: the Scopes "monkey" trial, in which a
teacher was prosecuted for teaching evolutionary theory to his students.
Two legal heavyweights of the day - William Jennings Bryan and Clarence
Darrow - waged battle over this issue in 1920s Tennessee, and although
playwrights Robert E. Lee and Jerome Lawrence took liberties with
reality while constructing "Inherit the Wind," the resonant
themes of the case remain the same.
"You can't do the entire trial in a two-hour show - you have to use
broad strokes," said David Keren, who plays Matthew Harrison Brady
(the character based on Bryan). "(The play) contends with two
things. Number one, that (evolution) is a theory, and number two, that
it doesn't necessarily erase the ideas in the Bible, in religion.
There's a line in the play that says, 'We weren't planted here like
geraniums in a pot,' but the play also suggests that accepting
evolutionary theory doesn't rule out the possibility that everything was
set in motion by a knowledgeable creator."
The 1960 film version of the play, starring Spencer Tracy, bluntly took
sides and championed the teacher and the Darrow-inspired character
(Henry Drummond), but the stage version takes more pains to level the
playing field somewhat.
"It definitely defends both sides," said Keren. "My
character is clearly in favor of the literal interpretation of
everything in the Bible, but he gets caught in the details. ... It's a
complex character. This is a man who's a brilliant man - he was a player
on the national and international stage, he was an important figure in
obtaining suffrage for women, and he worked with Wilson (as secretary of
state) on World War I. But he got so focused on this narrow issue that
all that he did before was forgotten. He's kind of a tragic character,
really."
Larry Rusinsky, who plays Drummond, developed a sense of kinship with
his character's open-mindedness. "Politically speaking, I'm on his
side," Rusinsky said. "I have a lot in common with the
character philosophically. I like the evenhandedness - that he's not a
caricature - but it's been a challenge getting this across, too. He
feels very guilty about destroying this man (Brady). There's a softer
edge to (Drummond) than the lines suggest."
Elliott has encouraged such readings of the work among his cast.
"I've looked at the play, and I don't see villains," he said.
"Other people will, but I don't. I just see people sticking to
their ideas and beliefs."
In Elliott's mind, a centrally important scene depicts an energetic
revival meeting. "A casual reader of the script might wonder,
'What's going on?"' he said. "But to me, this is taking us
down the path of where these people are, so you can see later what a
journey they've made. It crystallizes how far everyone has had to
go."